Comparative study on family psychology in swimming athletes
Keywords:
Comparative study, Family psychology, Athletes, Swimming.Abstract
The objective of the research is to carry out a comparative study on family psychology in swimming athletes. There are unresolved problems in the sports life of swimmers, one of them is the poor recognition of family psychology. Among the fundamental antecedents found in comparative studies are: Ares (2013) and Ricardo (2014); their contributions constitute basic foundations for the intervention; however, certain shortcomings related to motivation, attitude, human values, professional ethics, communication approach and the degree of understanding and influence were detected. These areas give rise to a novel look and a scientific approach to little studied topics such as sports family psychology. For the investigation, methods such as: analytical-synthetic, inductive-deductive, hypothetical-deductive were used. For the validation of the results, a quasi-experiment was structured, from the conformation of a control group and an experimental one. The study validates the importance of the sports psychologist and especially his intervention in the family area, as a basic element for competitive achievement. It also shows the advantages in performance and family understanding that psychological treatment provides. The control group denotes deficiencies that could be corrected with the help of the psychologist. On the other hand, the intervention carried out achieves a positive participation of the family. With the knowledge derived from the study, the existing needs are solved and the family becomes a mobilizing agent.
Downloads
References
Arés, P. (2013). La familia. Fundamentos básicos para su estudio e intervención. Psicología Selección de textos. Félix Varela.
Barrios-Duarte R. y Yáñez Rivera, A. (2007). La interacción atleta-familia en el deporte: enfoques para su estudio e intervención. Revista Ef deportes, Buenos Aires - Año 12 - N° 114 - Noviembre de 2007 https://www.efdeportes.com/efd114/la-interaccion-atleta-familia-en-el-deporte.htm
Coral Apolo G.; Rubio Villalba T.; Burbano Benavides M. (2017). Diferencias biomecánicas en natación utilitaria: estudio en deportistas principiantes y de alto rendimiento. Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd vol.36 no.2 La Habana abr.-jun. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-03002017000200017
Cantón Chirivella, E. (2009). Intervención psicológica con un nadador de medio acuático abierto. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, vol. 9, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2009, pp. 57-65. Universidad de Murcia, España https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=227014931005
García-Naveira (2009). Diferencias individuales en Estilos de Personalidad y rendimiento en deportistas. (Tesis doctoral inédita). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Morilla, M., Pérez, E., Gamito, J., Gómez, M., Sánchez, J. y Valiente, M. (2013). Planificación psicológica de la cantera del Sevilla F.C. S.A.D.: organización, funcionamiento y programa deportivo-formativo. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 3 (2), 17-30.
Ricardo De la Vega M. (2014). ¿Cómo perciben los entrenadores de fútbol el rol del psicólogo del deporte?: un estudio comparativo. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte Vol. 14 Núm. 2 https://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/199221
Ruiz, M.; Sánchez, A.; Durán, H. y Jiménez, M. (2017). Habilidades psicológicas de los entrenadores de fútbol. Wanceulen.
Stambulova, N. (2020). Athlete's Crises: A Developmental Perspective. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31, 51-60.
Wylleman, P. (2020). Interpersonal Relationship in Sport: Uncharted Territory in Sport Psychology Research. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31, 555-72.
Zaldivar, D. (2013). Las relaciones interpersonales. Revista Psicología Selección de Textos (pp.60-65).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sara Noemi Zapata-Moreira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content, based on the principle that providing the public with free access to research supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
In addition, open arbitration papers are accepted, preferably from Research Gate.